Cosmetics Companies: Beware of PFAS


It’s no secret that the regulatory landscape of cosmetics and personal care products as we know it is changing. Over the last few years, Congress, along with industry and consumer groups, have made a combined effort to push for heightened regulation of these products. The latest effort, introduced in Congress on June 15, 2021, seeks to ban the addition of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (generally known as “PFAS”) in cosmetics and personal care products.

The No PFAS in Cosmetics Act coincided with the release of a new study, which found markers of PFAS in 52% of 231 makeup products purchased in the U.S. and Canada. The study was published in the Environmental Science & Technology Letters and found that the highest levels were in foundations, waterproof mascara, and lipstick. On the heels of this study, the No PFAS in Cosmetics Act seeks to ban the intentional addition of PFAS in cosmetic products. (PFAS may be intentionally added to products for purposes of consistency and texture.) The term “cosmetics” is not defined in the bill’s language; however, this bill comes a few short months after the FDA published a webpage about PFAS in body lotions, nail polish, shaving cream, foundation, mascara, and other personal care products.

Notably, this bill is not the first legislative action taken to address PFAS in cosmetics. Last year, California passed Assembly Bill 2762, which bans the intentional addition of lead, mercury, and certain PFAS from cosmetics sold in the state beginning in 2025. In addition, California passed Senate Bill 312 last year, which requires manufacturers to disclose flavor and fragrance ingredients by 2022.

With consumer groups actively testing household goods, including cosmetics, for several different types of PFAS, companies should examine their products and supply chains and determine if, when, and where PFAS may affect their business.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

About the Author: Amy L. Waite

Amy Waite remains on the pulse of developments in product liability and environmental law, particularly as it pertains to the food and agribusiness space. She focuses her practice on helping clients improve product stewardship and manage liability risk. Her regulatory proficiency is matched only by her agricultural marketing savvy, which she draws on to support clients’ business strategy.

©2024 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Privacy Policy