EU’s Proposed Product Liability Directive – More Trick than Treat?

Share

Americans love a good scare on Halloween.  But, of course – with ancient castles, centuries of folklore, and actual Transylvania, our friends in the European Union know how to celebrate the spooky season just as well as we do.  Unfortunately, there’s more than ghost stories to send a shiver down your spine in the EU these days.  This month, a joint committee of the European Parliament voted on new amendments to the proposed “digital age” update of the Product Liability Directive, which was initially enacted in the 1980s.  On the one hand, the proposal seems like a treat with its efforts to modernize the product liability framework to account for the changing product landscape and to address access issues for consumers.  But many European business leaders caution that this is more trick than treat.  Among other things, there are concerns that the traditional burden of proof requirements and safeguards on evidentiary disclosures will vanish into thin air.  Concerns abound that the proposals won’t benefit consumers or industry, but rather lawyers and litigation funders.  Scary stuff, indeed.

You can read more about the proposed revision of the Product Liability Directive here. Now that the draft directive has passed the committee stage, it will be further negotiated and considered by the full European Parliament, which is popularly elected, and the Council of the European Union, which includes representatives of all 27 member states. Both bodies will have to agree on the final text of the Directive before it can be adopted. We will continue to follow this process as it is further considered.

Stay safe out there, boys and ghouls!

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

About the Author: Adrienne Franco Busby

Adrienne Franco Busby puts science and strategy to work for companies facing product liability litigation. She is an experienced litigator in product liability, commercial, employment, class action and mass tort matters.

About the Author: Eldin Hasic

Eldin Hasic is a puzzle solver, both of the jigsaw and complex litigation kind. He represents clients in multidistrict product liability litigation and helps them solve privacy law challenges through both counseling and dispute resolution. Eldin has worked on MDL matters since his first day at the firm, with a focus on complex and omnibus briefing, offensive discovery and mass tort litigation strategy. Eldin has been the primary associate on successful MDL and bellwether briefing for summary judgment and discovery requests, as well as current and complex product liability issues

About the Author: Patrick Reilly

Patrick Reilly represents multinational and Fortune 500 clients in complex litigation, regularly acting as national coordinating counsel to manufacturers in product liability actions. He also advises on sports law matters.

©2024 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Privacy Policy